Hi Samuel, Have you considered to use just the facet without the "accessible-with"?
> users would like to have accessibility::accessible-with::foobar tags for > applications. like accessibility::foobar instead? > More precisely, these are the kinds of tags that can be thought of: > > to describe whether the package is technically accessible: > - accessibility::accessible-with::at-spi > which can for example be basically applied to all gtk, qt, and java > graphical applications. That wouldn't necessarily mean usability, just > that technically the content of the application is available to screen > readers. and accessibility::screen-reader which is already present? > to describe whether the package is actually accessible via some medium: > - accessibility::accessible-with::braille > - accessibility::accessible-with::speech there is accessibility::speech I mean I'm not against the accessible-with, only I see some possible duplication or unnecessary complication here. One way or another, do you already have a list of possible tags to be created? Thanks Bye E. -- GPG Key: 4096R/F2133176 2010-10-19 Enrico Rossi <e.ro...@tecnobrain.com>
