Thorsten Glaser, le Tue 01 Sep 2015 09:13:17 +0200, a écrit : > why don't you version the B-D then? > > Build-Depends: ..., default-jdk (>= 2:1.6), ...
Because: - "I don't think it is possible (yet) to have a >= dependency on a java version." and yes, I was lazy to look for a proper solution. - depending on epoched default-jdk seems odd. Is it more or less supported that "2:1.6" means java 6? > That will cause GCJ arches to not even attempt the build, > beneficial for all. Which is what I said previously in the bug log. Samuel
