On 08/15/2014 08:12 AM, Mike Gabriel wrote: > Hi Jean-Philippe, > > On Fr 15 Aug 2014 12:05:29 CEST, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Given that MATE can install without orca, I thought it was easier if >> Orca could ship this. But indeed, we could create a mate-orca sackage. >> But does it worth for such little difference? I can help to do it, >> anyway if you tell me it's really the best solution. What's the >> process to introduce such package (beyond making the package, I mean, >> administratively speaking)? >> >> >> Regards, > > I would add it as one more binary package to the MATE desktop > environment meta package
Do what you will. I admittedly know absolutely nothing about package maintainership nor of Debian. But for what it's worth: I think what you might wish to consider instead of a symbolic link as your temporary "fix" is script mapping -- done in the one and only Orca package Debian maintains. See this patch [1] which I already committed to Orca master because a different downstream pointed out upstream that marco, at least at the moment, is pretty much still metacity but calling itself something else. The solution is verified already by that downstream reporter [2]. --joanie (Orca Project Lead) [1] https://git.gnome.org/browse/orca/commit/?id=409ebbc2 [2] https://mail.gnome.org/archives/orca-list/2014-August/msg00201.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-accessibility-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53ee0208.5070...@igalia.com
