On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:45:12AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Andreas Tille, le Fri 04 Jan 2013 09:20:19 +0100, a écrit : > > On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 11:29:47PM -0000, sthiba...@users.alioth.debian.org > > wrote: > > > URL: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/blends/?sc=1&rev=3688 > > > Log: > > > Add font to cope with dyslexia > > > ... > > > + > > > +Recommends: fonts-opendyslexia > > > > Is there any Vcs for the fonts-opendyslexia packaging? > > There's an ITP.
Well, yes, but we do not parse WNPP bugs but rather the VCS of relevant teams (like Debian Med, Debian Science, etc.) If Debian Accessibility might maintain its packages in SVN or Git we could parse this and get all needed information like Description, Homepage, License, Vcs-*, WNPP bug number (if closed in changelog) etc. So my question is: Is there any accessibility related Vcs where the team might maintain its packages and if not why not? If you wonder about the advantage you might like to have a look at http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/tasks/bio#pkgvcs-debs which is generated out of entries like ------- Depends: amos-assembler, hawkeye Depends: anfo Depends: apollo ... ------ For sure this is not the only advantage for having a Vcs to maintain team packages - but regarding Blends techniques it is. Hope this makes my point more clear. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-accessibility-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130104095649.gd10...@an3as.eu
