To my mind, it's amazing any of this has ever worked at all under these circumstances.
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Jude DaShiell, le Sat 18 Feb 2012 07:43:11 -0500, a ?crit : > > No mention of speakup is proper for versions of operating systems that > > will not install with the operating system and be operational. If there > > is a subset of synthesizers that will work with a particular version and > > for good reason others are not going to work that needs to be made clear > > giving a screen reader list that will work > > How could we ever do that? We *don't* own all kinds of hardware > synthesizers, so we can *not* test all of them, and thus we can not > document which ones work and which ones don't. That's why we call for > testing before releasing. If users don't test with their hardware, we > can not document whether it works or not (let alone fix the bugs). > > Only now that you said that 6.0.4 poses problem with ltlk, we can add a > paragraph in the release notes. But please *also* test a CD image of the > "testing" distribution of Debian (future 7), to check whether the bug > is still there and thus has to be tracked before releasing Debian 7, or > not. > > Again, without tests from users, we can *not* fix bugs. Really. It's as > simple as that. > > Samuel > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- Jude <jdashiel-at-shellworld-dot-net> <http://www.shellworld.net/~jdashiel/nj.html> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-accessibility-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.bsf.2.01.1202180803190.76...@freire1.furyyjbeyq.arg