Hi again, Ok, I understand better now I experienced. Indeed, orca 3.1.3 is still unusable. I don't see exactly the relationship, but I guess it's incompatible with at-spi1. It breaks the gnome accessibility (even downgrade prints a segfault). So ok to test orca 2.32 to wheezy or backport for me, why not push 2.91 to sid, but orca 3, not possible now. I wanted to say that to inform people after my previous messages. I had not understood such relationship.
Regards, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL Le mercredi 20 juillet 2011 à 19:06 +0200, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL a écrit : > Le mercredi 20 juillet 2011 à 18:57 +0200, Samuel Thibault a écrit : > > Jean-Philippe MENGUAL, le Wed 20 Jul 2011 18:55:29 +0200, a écrit : > > > > I would recommend to ad orca-2.32 to squeeze using the debian-backport > > > > repo. > > > > > > I can do if the team agrees. > > > > It's probably good to propose backports for accessibility software > > indeed, provided that they do not bring regressions. > > To ensure this, I suggest we update in wheezy, then when some tests are done, > we backport. We can do this with 2.32 or 2.91. But 2.91.6 has a regression > bug, I'm sure, with the punctuation. 2.32, I don't know. That's why I ask to > those who tested here. To test, we can update in wheezy (testing), or in sid > too. > > Regards, > > > > Samuel > > > > > Jean-Philippe MENGUAL > > > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-accessibility-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1311183946.3037.50.camel@maison
