Jason White <ja...@jasonjgw.net> writes: > Also, for audio editing and other high-performance applications, jackd > appears to be still the sound server of choice - PA doesn't meet the > requirements for low-latency audio that jackd is designed to satisfy.
Yes, this is probably the most sad part about the PA story. While the linux audio community has jackd since many years, and many linux audio applications do support jackd directly very nicely, the PA people still insisted on reimplementing yet another audio server, and not caring about low latency. So what we now have is jackd for audio work, and PA for desktop audio. I am really not sure this makes any sense, but well. -- CYa, ⡍⠁⠗⠊⠕ | Debian Developer <URL:http://debian.org/> .''`. | Get my public key via finger mlang/k...@db.debian.org : :' : | 1024D/7FC1A0854909BCCDBE6C102DDFFC022A6B113E44 `. `' `- <URL:http://delysid.org/> <URL:http://www.staff.tugraz.at/mlang/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-accessibility-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
