[ I'm sending this email to the maintainers and co-maintainers of the seven Debian kernel modules packages currently build-depending on cdbs. (atl2, exmap, gpib, gspca, speakup, squashfs and vloopback.) I hope I didn't cast too wide a net -- please accept my apologies if this is the case. ]
I would like to request your feedback on my work to add support for kernel modules packaging to CDBS, which I have just submitted[*] to the Build-common-hackers mailing-list. [*] <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/build-common-hackers/2009-March/004609.html> My goal was to try and make modules packaging as easy as the rest of CDBS, instead of the hodge-podge we currently have to deal with. I'd very much like for maintainers to let me know whether I have succeeded or not, and what I could do to improve things. So, if you can spare the time, please send me your comments/questions, either on the (open) mailing-list, or privately. If you wish, I can send you a copy of the email so you may easily quote and reply to it. (And do feel free to reply: "That email is too damn long! Can't you just show me what my debian/rules would look like?" <g>) Thanks for your help! -- Being overloaded is the sign of a true Debian maintainer. -- JHM on #Debian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-accessibility-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
