Hi Charlie, On Wed, 2020-08-12 at 11:38 +0200, Karoly Balogh (Charlie/SGR) wrote: > Sorry for the delayed response, yes, we in upstream are willing to fix > theissue, although we run regular tests with QEMU, and those are lookinggood. > So not sure what could cause that build problem, but we're alsomostly doing > cross-builds with m68k, not native builds. > I know I promised to look into this, but never really had time in the lastfew > weeks, sorry about it. It turned out, our SVN trunk was broken forLinux-m68k, > so I fixed that meanwhile, but FPC 3.2.0 was forked earlier tothat breakage, > so if there's an issue it must be different. I'll getthere, meanwhile but of > course any input is welcome. I looked deeper in the issue and it seems that it may be a bug in the initial compiler /usr/bin/ppc68k which is used to bootstrap the cycle. This compiler is of version 3.0.4+dfsg-23.
So a possible way to overcome this is to perform a binary upload to m68k. However I was not able to generate packages by cross compilation. -- Cheers, Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part