On 10/05/2017 11:49 PM, Christoph Biedl wrote: > About that particular issue I'd really like to avoid a per-architecture > switch in busybox. It adds complexity and works around a problem > instead of solving it.
I wouldn't call that simple if-clause complexity. > So please take this to gcc first unless you've > already done so. And let us know if you get the impression this won't > get fixed soon-ish - breaking an architecture still beats packaging > principles. gcc bugs aren't usually something that get fixed promptly, in particular when talking about non-mainstream architectures like m68k. I will mark busybox as "Not-For-Us" for the time being now because I don't want to be chasing this package over this and keep building it manually so that debian-installer doesn't break for us. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
