On 12/12/2016 11:40 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > So, there are actually two related bug reports. > > gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57583
The suggested patch in this bug report actually works. With the patch applied and with -mlong-jump-table-offsets in CFLAGS, I can build the offending C++ code file in mednafen. Can we get this patch applied or is there anything that speaks against doing so? Since the behavior is enabled with an option (and therefore opt-in), I don't think there is much that we can break doing so, is there? An improved version would probably use the long jumps automatically, depending on the size of the switch statements, wouldn't it? Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
