On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 09:45:33PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > including ports that don’t yet exist.
Hmm. I don't think we should really worry about that case. Ports that do not even exist yet will definitely need a working gcc-5 if they ever expect to be released architectures some day. So the natural thing to do (which I think it is what we have always done, but I may be wrong) is to use unstable as their starting point, not stable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150808221836.gb26...@cantor.unex.es
