Matthias Klose dixit: >the package maintainers. Halt the buildds and re-enable them once you have >updated your buildds.
Erm. This is so wrong on several counts. • What builds gcc-5 if not the buildds? • There *will* be people later who build packages for other, e.g. new (think arm64) architectures. They need to build them in order. Build-Depends is what defines that order; otherwise any old package in any version is fine. Santiago Vila dixit: >Thorsten, your work on the m68k arch is really amazing, but I don't >think that submitting "grave" bugs for bugs that only happen in m68k Who says this only happens on m68k? >I'll be happy to add a versioned B-D in the next upload just in case >it helps It helps for those architectures who did not build the new gettext yet, including ports that don’t yet exist. I would like to hear from either of you two how we can fixup the situation for m68k in the meantime. bye, //mirabilos -- [16:04:33] bkix: "veni vidi violini" [16:04:45] bkix: "ich kam, sah und vergeigte"... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1508082142310.6...@herc.mirbsd.org
