On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Finn Thain <fth...@telegraphics.com.au> 
> wrote:
> >> Once we do have a fixed version, we can communicate that around.
> >
> > If upsteam python gets fixed and that creates work for you, then pin 
> > your python version until you can build a new aranym, or somehow 
> > prevent the new python from being uploaded. You probably have a 
> > hundred ways to solve this issue. It is a problem for Debian buildd's. 
> > The upstream python bug tracker is obviously not the place to address 
> > it.
> 
> Indeed. Discussing it there will only put more fuel on the incentive to 
> not accept patches for unsupport architectures.
> 
> (Oh no, I though there was only one m68k user left, but there are three, 
> and they're fragmented ;-)

Clearly there should be one architecture per user. I want my FPGA.

-- 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/alpine.LNX.2.00.1404041930190.29768@nippy.intranet

Reply via email to