On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:16 AM, Finn Thain <fth...@telegraphics.com.au> wrote:
>> > ! CONFIG_FB_SYS_COPYAREA : m n
>> > ! CONFIG_FB_SYS_FILLRECT : m n
>> > ! CONFIG_FB_SYS_FOPS : m n
>> > ! CONFIG_FB_SYS_IMAGEBLIT : m n
>> >
>> >Would this prevent the macfb framebuffer console from working in the
>> >absence of kernel modules?
>> >
>>
>> With the switch to initrd, absence of modules is simply no longer
>> supported at all, period.
>
> When something goes wrong, and the kernel messages aren't available to
> tell you what went wrong, then you may lack the information you need to
> support those things that you are willing to support.
>
> Hence I was trying to find an explanation for the screen shot posted,
> which says "console [tty0] enabled" even though the macfb console did not
> appear.
No, without fb/console support you wouldn't even see those.
>> ...
>> Besides, if multi_defconfig has it as "n"...
>
> That should be OK; all of my test kernel configs also disable these
> options.
Indeed. Mac needs the CONFIG_FB_CFB_* counterparts.
CONFIG_FB_SYS_* is for system RAM, while CONFIG_FB_CFB_*
is for iomem. Not that it would matter much on m68k, m68k has no
strict separation between both.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAMuHMdXKPDo-cNL5btcmy=4obz9WB2W=9buxbu5m72uxdsy...@mail.gmail.com
