Christian T. Steigies dixit: >So what is the problem with debootstrapping unstable?
Dependencies are not guaranteed, and there are often to usually multiple versions of packages in unstable (not just on Debian-Ports), which makes debootstrap choke every so often. You can only reliably debootstrap both stable and testing (and, of course, oldstable). >Are some important packages still in unreleased Nah, nothing important, just binutils and eglibc… >and btw what is "unreleased"? https://wiki.debian.org/DebianPorts/WhatIsUnreleased >Then I hope it is only a matter of time until they move to unstable. After the unfreeze, I guess. >That might help in getting a working d-i, and maybe new CD images >*dream* :-) Nope. Nothing guarantees unstable will stay installable without unreleased. But (once I get time), I have some ideas for d-i to work with Debian-Ports ☺ bye, //mirabilos -- <gcc> ncal.c: In function 'parsemonth': warning: comparison between pointer and integer • <mirabilos> ↑ hab da „in function parselmouth“ gelesen <Natureshadow> ICH AUCH! • <Natureshadow> Ich hab gerade gedacht "Häh? Wie, hab da parselmouth gelesen ... steht da doch auch :o?" -- too much fanfic… -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1301242207260.6...@herc.mirbsd.org
