Dixi quod…
>Ivan Maidanski dixit:
>
>>Could you summarize please you suggestion how to fix this?
>
>I need to make a couple more checks. *Maybe* it got fixed
>with the new eglibc patch already, since the Debian package
>7.3~alpha3+git20121114-1 unexpectedly *passed* all its tests.
OK, after some tests, I can confirm that the patched libc,
independent of the kernel, fixes the test_stack program.
@Debian eglibc maintainers: So this means that yes, please
include the patch when your policy permits (it’s fine if it
is not possible until after the wheezy release and unfreeze,
I’ll carry a patched version until then).
@boehm-gc people: I think you need to not do anything. Note
that I could not test master as autoreconf didn’t want to
work for me, but Ivan, if you could private-mail me a tarball
of master where I just need to run ./configure && make check,
I will gladly do that.
@Debian-68k people: this tests the eglibc patch and validates
that we indeed want it; as for the kernel patch, the test has
not yet compiled far enough to see. I’m running the rebuilt
kernel already (the atari flavour is built early enough ☺),
and it at least shows no regressions.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
“It is inappropriate to require that a time represented as
seconds since the Epoch precisely represent the number of
seconds between the referenced time and the Epoch.”
-- IEEE Std 1003.1b-1993 (POSIX) Section B.2.2.2
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1211211917140.6...@herc.mirbsd.org
