Nicholas Bamber dixit: > Thorsten, > I think it is possible to put in an architecture specific exception.
OK, thanks. > However a little more background would is needed as to why we should make that > effort. I wrote that: > On 05/05/12 17:44, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >> since doko has said from the start that wheezy will not release >> with gcc-4.5 (only 4.4 and 4.6 and, it looks like, 4.7), it was ↑ here ↑ (In case I assumed too much: doko is the gcc maintainer.) So, there simply is no gcc-4.5 package on m68k, only gcc-4.4 which has "known good, but nobody works on it any more" state, gcc-4.6 which is the currently being worked on version, and gcc-4.7 which nobody has really looked at it yet other than making sure it com- piles (actually, gcj-4.7 does not even compile). Plus lack of manpower… bye, //mirabilos -- Solange man keine schmutzigen Tricks macht, und ich meine *wirklich* schmutzige Tricks, wie bei einer doppelt verketteten Liste beide Pointer XORen und in nur einem Word speichern, funktioniert Boehm ganz hervorragend. -- Andreas Bogk über boehm-gc in d.a.s.r -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1205051738380.31...@herc.mirbsd.org
