On 04/13/2012 02:07 PM, Francesca Ciceri wrote: > > @ debbugs people: Is there any chance to include in the BTS also > not-released ports? I mean, I know they technically are not Debian, > but also non-free is not Debian and it is in the BTS ;) Are there > reasons to avoid it, or is it technically possible to track also > packages in debian-ports.org? >
What's the point in doing that? Really. IMHO, if debbugs folks could invest some time to fix something, it would be integrating debian-backports information in BTS. non-free is different from non-official ports… since they live in the official archive/servers. -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f89077f.2010...@dogguy.org
