Oliver Korff dixit: > I believe, that stockfish will build fine after solving the old build > problems.
The following excerpts from the build log show that it will not be all fine: |cd src && make profile-build ARCH=x86-32-old && make testrun (This is not i386) |Config: |debug: 'no' |optimize: 'yes' |arch: 'i386' |os: 'any' |bits: '32' |bigendian: 'no' |prefetch: 'no' |bsfq: 'no' |popcnt: 'no' Here, arch and bigendian are wrong (no idea what bsfq or popcnt are or whether the meaning of prefetch matches). Also, I have DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS='nobench nocheck' set, which your package doesn’t honour: |Step 1/4. Building executable for benchmark ... |make ARCH=x86-32-old COMP=gcc gcc-profile-make This is stockfish_2.1.1-1 FYI. You will need to fix these problems. bye, //mirabilos, human m68k buildd -- [...] if maybe ext3fs wasn't a better pick, or jfs, or maybe reiserfs, oh but what about xfs, and if only i had waited until reiser4 was ready... in the be- ginning, there was ffs, and in the middle, there was ffs, and at the end, there was still ffs, and the sys admins knew it was good. :) -- Ted Unangst über *fs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1109071305140.5...@herc.mirbsd.org
