Francesca Ciceri dixit: >@@ -5,7 +5,9 @@ > > <p>The Motorola 680x0 series of processors have powered personal > computers and workstations since the mid-1980s. Debian currently runs >-on the 68020, 68030, 68040 and 68060 processors. >+on the 68020, 68030, 68040 and 68060 processors: this is an unofficial port >+meaning that there's not an official and released m68k port but this port is >+under development.</p> > > <p>Please note that a > <a href="http://foldoc.org/foldoc.cgi?query=memory+management+unit">
I’d add “… and released m68k port _any more_” here, since it used to be and people hope it will eventually become one. >@@ -20,10 +22,31 @@ > <h2>Status</h2> > > <p>The Debian m68k port was first officially released with Debian 2.0 >-(hamm).</p> >+(hamm) and was an official port until Debian 4.0 (etch). There's now an effort >+to revive this port.</p> > >-<p>Current Debian releases support Atari, Amiga, VMEbus, and some Macintosh >-systems.</p> >+<p>Currently, the Debian/m68k port supports Atari, Amiga, VMEbus, and some >+Macintosh systems.</p> lgtm >+<p>For now, the m68k team is facing two pressing issues <a >+href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2010/11/msg00077.html"><tt>res_init()</tt> >+segfaults</a> and <a Yes, no feedback on that from either 68k or eglibc yet, but I’ll try to look deeper into it and/or prod more people when getting back from VAC (possibly starting today). >+href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2010/12/msg00000.html">gcj, possibly >+boehm-gc, fails out in <tt>sem_wait</tt></a>, but Working on it, new eglibc is compiling, thanks _again_ to Andreas Schwab. Maybe it helps, maybe it isn’t. I think we shouldn’t hardcode such things on the main website but refer to something like the as-of-yet not created https://wiki.debian.org/M68k/Status instead. >+<p> >+Thorsten Glaser has created <a >+href="http://people.debian.org/~tg">a tarball</a> of a freshly made http://people.debian.org/~tg/f/m68k/ I had that linked from https://wiki.debian.org/M68k/Cowbuilder which you mentioned, but maybe not visibly enough. (I’m not really good at structuring documentation, admittedly.) >+<tt>/var/cache/pbuilder/base.cow</tt> (which can also be used as a chroot >+of Debian unstable on any Linux/m68k machine, or as starting point for that) … machine with a TLS capable kernel, … >+and he plan to upgrade it quite regularly. At least for some time. I don’t promise I stick with m68k for long, but it peeked my interest, and I’m learning a lot. Rest looks good too. Thanks, //mirabilos -- “Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.” -- Edward Burr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1101031651521.31...@herc.mirbsd.org