Hi,
I believe this may be a bug in our binutils:
r...@ara2:~ # cat >x.s
.text
fmove.l %d1, %fpcr
r...@ara2:~ # as x.s
r...@ara2:~ # as x.s -mfidoa
x.s: Assembler messages:
x.s:2: Error: invalid instruction for this architecture; needs 68020 [68k,
68ec020], 68030 [68ec030], 68040 [68ec040], 68060 [68ec060], cpu32 [68330,
68331, 68332, 68333, 68334, 68336, 68340, 68341, 68349, 68360], 547x [5470,
5471, 5472, 5473, 5474, 5475], 548x [5480, 5481, 5482, 5483, 5484, 5485] --
statement move.l %d1,%fpcr' ignored
Is it possible as thinks -mfidoa has no FPU? Andreas? Kazu?
This would explain the gcc-4.4 build aborting in libfortran
for the mfidoa multilib/multiarch…
Thanks in advance,
//mirabilos
--
Solange man keine schmutzigen Tricks macht, und ich meine *wirklich*
schmutzige Tricks, wie bei einer doppelt verketteten Liste beide
Pointer XORen und in nur einem Word speichern, funktioniert Boehm ganz
hervorragend. -- Andreas Bogk über boehm-gc in d.a.s.r
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1011012144550.27...@herc.mirbsd.org
