Hi Michael,
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> as you've probably noticed, my previous EtherNAT patch does not compile
> without this one being applied as well.
>
> Comments welcome (is there anyone on this list with access to an EtherNAT
> card,
> besides cts and myself?).
>
> Regarding performance afforded by having a 100 Mbit PHY instead of a 10 Mbit
> one:
>
> EtherNAT: 210 KB/s out, 140 KB/s in (scp of a 35 MB vmlinux file)
> EtherNEC: 175 KB/s out, 128 KB/s in (same file)
>
> Hardly worth it, eh?
That's slower than my Ariadne?
BTW, do you have a patch for this?
| drivers/net/atari_91C111.c:2317: error: 'struct smc91x_platdata' has no
member named 'irq_flags'
| drivers/net/atari_91C111.c:2361: error: 'struct smc91x_platdata' has no
member named 'irq_flags'
| drivers/net/atari_91C111.c:2371: error: 'struct smc91x_platdata' has no
member named 'irq_flags'
| drivers/net/atari_91C111.c:2411: error: 'struct smc91x_platdata' has no
member named 'irq_flags'
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
