On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:21:16PM -0300, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:50:09AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > Can we leave most of the mirrors in place, and just add dedicated m68k > > mirror / package list for the patched m68k packages? I.e. if we can use > > something from main, don't bother duplicating? > > Probably, but we'll need to rebuild d-i anyway if we want to use a > separate mirror list. The debian-installer package only buildds out of lenny now, which is why it's currently listed as n-f-u. Fixing the mirror list and building the package, shouldn't be a big deal once lenny's operational (I hope). > [...] > >>> 10. Maybe offer the same services to other ports that are not > >>> releasing with lenny since the infrastructure will already be in > >>> place. > > > > Separate admins needed here? > > It's probably good to remember that debian-ports already exists... Although we aren't admins afaik. > Something entirely different: Debconf is being followed by quite a few > people through the video streams (see http://video.debconf.org:8000/ if > you care to peek), and I was thinking that it could be a good idea to > set up a stream such as that one in Kiel, too. If we can get a camera > with Firewire-connection and a desktop that's powerful enough and has > enough diskspace to store the recording (13G per hour), and the network > connection is good enough (don't expect that to be a problem at a > university) then that would give us two benefits: > - videos for posterity (we'll probably be able to convince holger that > it's a good idea to host them on meetings-archive.debian.net) > - allowing those who can't make it to Kiel to join to some extent > through IRC and the video stream. > > What do other people think? Works for me. Peace, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
