On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:21:14PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 04:52:40PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote: >>> >>>> * pie: we've got a number of packages that fail to build because -pie >>>> gives a nonrepresentational output. Can that option be a no-op or >>>> something on m68k so at least stuff builds without m68k-specific >>>> workarounds? >>> >>> You do have <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2008-03/msg00024.html> >>> applied to binutils, right, since I previously pointed to that on this >>> list? (If you do, I don't know what the problem with -pie is.) >> >> Thanks! I can confirm that patch is not in our binutils. Off to file a >> bug. > > Rats - I was almost certain we had forwarded that to the binutils > maintainer already. See > http://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2008/03/msg00007.html > > What's the problem with integrating that patch into our current version > of binutils?
Well the version number is cvs20080103-4, which makes me think it's not recent enough for the patch to already be there. I would think the patch itself would just work, but I haven't built and tested it (yet). -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
