On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Brad Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 06:12:31PM +1100, Finn Thain wrote: > > That explains why the patch below never worked on my Q950. I never > > sent the patch because I figured there was something, well, fixable. > > It works on CUDA. I think I tested Mac II ADB too, but I don't > > remember the results. > > Yes, that patch would cause a Q900 or Q950 to crash on RTC/PRAM access, > just like the 2.2 kernel did. It should work fine on any PMU, CUDA, or > EGRET based systems. It will most likely work on all the traditional VIA > bit-banging access systems, too. That code is pretty simple. If you do > commit this, it's probably better to also add an exception for the Q900 > and Q950 in the code so it doesn't crash. I don't get a crash on the Q950, but I'll do some more testing before I send a patch. For one thing, the write code (systohc) is commented out even though that works on CUDA too. -f -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
