Re: [mac68k] Do you ant to play with a floppy ?

[Laurent Vivier]

Le 4 sept. 07 à 11:02, Brian Morris a écrit :

On 9/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On 9/2/07, Laurent Vivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Le 2 sept. 07 à 06:59, Brian Morris a écrit :

On 8/31/07, Laurent Vivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

≈

You can try a good one in the nightly snapshot of EMILE:

http://emile.sourceforge.net/SNAPSHOT/multiboot-2.2.27- rc2_0.12CVS.bin.bz2

got It, also got the 2.6.18 ... there are too many kernels and also
compiler versions floating around these days. 18 is good for etch

is best supported now although it has to be gotten from sid, until
unless officially released to etch in updates.

if you don't have ide (also maybe could be used with sarge). 21 or 22

Where can I find up-to-date kernel ?

Well the one i have running now i got from sid, but the
that was in June last I update because the libc6 is stuck.

I have dowloaded the cvs sources because that was
reccommended I think as the best and simplest way to
try and use gcc4.1. I *think* this is maintained by geert
who claimed he had built 68k kernel with gcc4.1 since
last november.

In fact, yesterday I booted a 2.6.22.6 from kernel.org (built with gcc 3.4)

I would also trust Finn's kernels as he is the most active
mac-68k developer. or Christian's.

I notice you are using peculiar (to me) versions of compilers.
3.4 for m68k and 4.1 as cross compiler. Is this more compatible ?

Reason I ask is there was some discussion on the list lately about
have had held on to 3.3 too long and why and problems with
4.1 (and 4.2 now as well).

So I use gcc 3.

In fact, for m68k, I tried to move to gcc 4 but it generates incorrect code.

Part of my question was how or why you have 3.4 when
I have 3.3, I cannot recall seeing 3.4 anywhere except
on gnu website so it may be you built it yourself from gnu ?

 stollen from Sarge to Etch.




 ---------------------- Laurent Vivier ----------------------
"Imagination is more important than knowledge."

No I used toolchain-source_3.4-5_all.deb and toolchain-source- gdb_3.4-5_all.deb According to the file I have, I built it in february 2007, so I know I tried GCC 4 at this time and I know it breaks EMILE because generated code was not the good one.

PGP.sig
Description: Ceci est une signature électronique PGP