> Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > (real or emulated) could take up some of the backlog at times. We'd need
> > to prevent an emulated system attempting to build a CPU intensive package,
>
> I'd say that it's exactly the other way round - I personally would let
> ARAnyM pick up the bigger/more resource hungry packages since with
> ARAnyM you have almost unlimited RAM and disk space... As for the CPU
> load, after Roman's speed-up patch I think it's no longer an issue.
OK; is that patch already in the unstable Debian package?
> In other words, I don't think we'd need the build time estimate up front.
Not for ARAnyM host, at least.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
