On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 11:50:17PM +1100, Finn Thain wrote: > > > > How will the m68k cope with the glibc problem for Lenny in the future? > > > How is the Coldfire port going on? > > I think Aranym is a better prospect than ColdFire. Without revisiting the > > ISA differences etc, Aranym wins on availability and price. > > Well, the impression I got from Bills aranym tests are, that it is not much > faster than any real m68k hardware. Has it ever been profiled running linux? If it ever approaches Apple's PowerMac-native m68k emulator (which used dynamic recompilation, IIRC) you could expect about half the performance of the host. -f > It's great for developers without access to real hardware, but it's not > that way that you'll have a nice quadcore server to replace all of our > current buildds and to meet the release criteria. But maybe I got > something wrong... > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
