On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 04:11:31PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > >> > emacs21: somehow got magically fixed, just retry with new gcc > >> > >> still failing on the buildds > > > > The weird build system had me confused there. > > Anyway, I fixed one gcc bug, but now it's failing a bit later and it's > > rather hard to get something reproducable now and my knowledge of lisp is > > limited. > > It compiles with -O0, so if someone wants to look into it, one possibility > > would be to compare the behaviour between a version compiled with -O0 and > > -O1 and try to locate the point where it behaves different. > > > > bye, Roman > > Could we make an upload with -O0 for m68k? There are several packages > stuck on emacs21.
About 9 packages. :) I'm not in a position to do this right now, but I'll get to it eventually if no one else does. If someone else want to give it a go, please drop a note to 329092 that it now builds with -O0. It might be good to test one of the packages that build-deps on it to see if it will work with the -O0 version before upload. Maybe also update the bug report with what -O1 does. Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
