On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 08:19:39PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 12:56:47PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > Is that octave2.1 or octave2.9? octave2.9 is building on akire. > > octave2.1 is still needs-build. > > It is octave2.1_2.1.73-13 which is in need-build. Okay, I'll mark that for you (octave2.1_1:2.1.73-13). > > Please also try gnuradio-core if you get the chance. icedove might be a > > good choice also. > > As far as I understand: gnuradio-core source package is renamed to > gnuradio. I tried to build gnuradio, but the build-dep were > uninstallable. Okay, looks like both are in needs-build. FWIW, I'm dropping the buildd priority on both of them, since our regular buildds haven't seemed to get the job done yet. > > If you drop me/us a list of whatever you're building, we'll mark it in > > w-b so no one else wastes time on it. > I will notify you when I start to build a package. Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
