Hi, On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > > >> Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> > Well, that's what we want as well and if m68k could provide this, what's > >> > the reason this couldn't be released as "Debian"? > >> > >> So far, m68k *can't* provide it. That's the problem. > > > > Which we are trying to fix, so what if we _could_? > > Then m68k would be a suitable release candidate for etch+1. As usual you're avoiding the issue. The answer is not _that_ simple. bye, Roman PS: 4 days and still no response to guile-1.6 patch... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
