On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 12:39:58PM +0200, Riccardo wrote:

> Gcj could be attemtped too and afaik it has means in the classpath  
> build to split up the compiation and thus require less resources, I  

Which would be great.

> have never tried it either but now that gcc 4.1 is working on 68k, I  
> suppose gcj is usable too?

Yes, we now have excellent gcj-4.1 support.

-- 
Stephen R. Marenka     If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to