* Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061017 14:19]: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 01:42:07PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:55:02PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > It's with some regret that I have to confirm that m68k is not going to be > > > a > > > release architecture for etch. > > > > > We have also asked about removing m68k from testing since it is not > > > currently a release candidate; Anthony Towns has indicated his preference > > > to defer this until another solution can be implemented for m68k's needs. > > > This raises the question again of what such a structure should look like; > > > I > > > think it would be a good idea for us to begin to tackle this question, > > > > It's just short of a month since Steve posted this, with, as far as > > I've seen, no concrete suggestions on what the m68k porters want to do > > about this. > > I *have* asked about the possibility to maintain our own > slightly-different m68k distribution (similar to how amd64 works for > sarge) on debian.org servers, but have not heard anything about that.
If it turns out to not be possible on debian.org-servers, it is definitly possible on debian.net-machines :) Be welcome to be our guest. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
