On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 08:55:37PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > I think we should start with sorting packages out that have a long term > history of FTBFS. It seems unlikely to me that these packages can be fixed > in time for the release. Adding to N-F-U or P-A-S would be best. > The main goal should be to give a stable release to all those m68k users out > there, not to keep as much packages buildable on m68k as possible.
Our last successful build of subversion was 1.2.0-1 on June 14, 2005. The current version is 1.3.2-5. Subversion is blocking 7 packages. Our last successful build of emacs21 was 21.4a-1 on March 18, 2005. The current version is 21.4a-6. emacs21 is blocking 14 packages. If we can't build basic tools like subversion and emacs21, does the rest of that really matter? -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
