On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 07:52:12PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 01:43:46AM +1000, Finn Thain wrote: > > > > > > I may be able help with some compute cycles, as I've just obtained a > > Quadra 840AV. > > My buildds have been idle for a while, but there were lots of dependency > problems. I had about a dozen xfce packages that would not build, and it > seems to boil down to this: > > libgtk2.0-dev: Depends: libgtk2.0-0 (= 2.8.18-1) > > whereas some other gtk2.0 package wants 2.8.18-6, but this package is not > available for m68k. I have no idea why. Another problem is this:
This is because gtk+2.0 is building/failed. I'd say to dep-wait them on libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.8.18-6). > kdelibs4-dev: Depends: kdelibs4c2a (= 4:3.5.3-1) but it is not going to be > installed This is because kdelibs is building/failed. I'd say to dep-wait them on kdelibs4-dev (>= 4:3.5.4-3). (I hope to recompiling binutils will allow kdelibs to build.) The other thing is anything sdl-dependent on libsdl1.2debian (>= 1.2.11-1). Hmmm, that should've been uploaded by now. > More CPU power is good, but unsatisfiable build-deps or broken binutils are > the bigger problem. I don't think binutils are that bad, but I did not check > for a while. The binutils problem is really a gcc optimiser problem. If you want an idea of what our 193 node dependency tree looks like, check out <http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/m68kbugs/reports/blockers.html>. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
