On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 09:32:10PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 01:33:50AM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote: > > > I think you are all aware the m68k port can be dropped for etch > > if nothing is done to speed up m68k buildd network at least, but > > unfortunately, not at last. Though, I do not know for sure whether > > we still need kernels 2.2 and 2.4 for m68k: kernel 2.6 works well on > > my Quadra950 and on a friend's Quadra940AV. However, it seems there > > is some toolchain work needed from what I read on that list. > > The 2.2 and 2.4 kernels are going to be dropped from etch -- spend the > time on 2.6. Amiga is mostly ready for primetime. Mac mostly isn't. None > of the other subarchs work at all as far as I know. So we'll move > forward based on amiga and maybe mac.
How about I drop everything but amiga and mac from the official linux-images for now? I can still cross-build all the other arches, but with just two arches, that actually work, I would even do a native build, so we would get header packages that work and fix a few build failures. And I could merge mac patches that conflict with sun at the moment, so mac support might be even better. BTW the kernel team(?) decided that we use gcc-4.0 now for all arches, I am not sure if that works for m68k, did anybody build a kernel with gcc-4 already? Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
