On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 10:35:14PM +0100, Andreas Fester wrote: > what is the proper way to > > "Please (re)check, if a package can be built by g++ > 3.4 > on [hppa/arm/m68k]"?
Ask here usually works. > Do I simply remove the explicit build dependency on g++, > upload the package and wait if it succeeds (and probably > create the next package version with the build dependencies > re-added again if it still fails)? That's the surest way. > Or are there any sandboxes available (I am no DD) to try it > on specific architectures before uploading? I don't know if any of the m68k boxes are available to non-DD's. Maybe someone will speak up. > I am specifically talking about > http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2005/11/msg00123.html > which should be fixed now... That bug does indeed seem fixed on m68k. Several other packages that were plagued by it are now built. > If anyone is volunteering on checking the package on > hppa/arm/m68k :-), its log4cxx, available at Note also that log4cxx is currently needs-build on m68k (major backlog). -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
