On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 09:28:30AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > that's unreproducible on crest/sid, although I can reproduce it on > another machine with the very same versions of gcc-4.0 and libc6. So > why not file it for libc6?
What cpu type is that other machine? I assume that ska is a 040? > The point of reassigning the report to an unknown package is to ask, > if it's time to drop m68k from the release architectures or just set > the severity of all m68k reports to wishlist. There's currently nobody > interested in forwarding m68k related bug reports upstream and testing > m68k compiler versions. There are at least six more unhandled m68k > reports. > My email from July > (http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/07/msg00069.html) > is left unanswered, so I have to assume, that m68k isn't supported > anymore and will start to downgrade all m68k related reports to a > non-RC severity. Uhm? Unanswered? I thought Wouter and Adam step up to fill the gap? -- Ciao... // Fon: 0381-2744150 Ingo \X/ SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij/public_key.asc
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
