On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 12:37:40 +0200 Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For what it's worth, fvwm would probably still fall under the category of a Window Manager rather than a full-blown desktop environment like KDE or Gnome. But yes, it does do pretty well on low-resource computers. I still use fvwm-95 on an old '486 laptop with 20M RAM running RedHat 5.1 and I suspect it would also be a good choice on a '68k machine. > Am 2004-08-16 20:32:17, schrieb Ron Johnson: > > > Specifically, desktops are richer and more powerful than window > > managers. Meaning they use more RAM and disk space. > > What about 'fvwm' > > I run it on a Macintosh IIvx :-) > > Greetings > Michelle > > -- > Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ > Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 > 50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi > 0033/3/88452356 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) > -- Joel Ewy jce-m68k ~at~ swbell ~dot~ net
