On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, Petr Stehlik wrote:
> V Ne, 01. 08. 2004 v 14:13, Geert Uytterhoeven pí¨e:
> > Building m68kboot can indeed be tricky due to include differences between
> > old
> > and new kernels.
>
> what is new and what is old? I tried using 2.2.25 include folder but it
> fails with
2.0 is `old', 2.2 is `new'.
> > For now, your best bet is to fix up includes when you encounter problems.
> > I'm
> > even willing to check in fixes if you send patches (CC'd to the list,
> > please).
>
> Last year you told me to check out the latest bootstrap sources from
> CVS. I just did that and compared it with source code of bootstrap I
> happened to find elsewhere and the CVS source was older - didn't contain
> support for CT2 (Centurbo II accelerator for Falcon). So it seems that
> the development was not carried there lately.
Strange... I didn't know that. AFAIK it's been years ago anyone really touched
m68kboot.
BTW, where did you find an ataboot with CT2 support?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
