On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 03:04:50PM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote: > Greetings! Would the 68k community like me to build lapack on crest > using gcc-snapshot in an effort to eliminate the current testing > failures, or is this not a wise use of resources? (load is 3 on this > box).
You should ask this on [EMAIL PROTECTED], as documented on www.d.o/ports/m68k/ Nevertheless, if you're convinced that lapack would build if it ever would reach the head of the wanna-build queue, it's not advisable to do so. OTOH, if there are some issues with building lapack on m68k which you'd need to debug, feel free to try out whatever you need on crest; that's what it's for. > BTW, I assume its still the case that Linux 68k doesn't run on NeXT > black hardware? I actually have one of these. Nope. Someone did start some kernel hacking on NeXT black hardware back in the 2.0 days, but the support was never finished. So unless you're a kernel hacker with too much time on your hands, it's unlikely you'll get that box to do something useful. -- Wouter Verhelst Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org Nederlandstalige Linux-documentatie -- http://nl.linux.org "Stop breathing down my neck." "My breathing is merely a simulation." "So is my neck, stop it anyway!" -- Voyager's EMH versus the Prometheus' EMH, stardate 51462.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
