On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 10:52, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 04:02:49PM +0200, Christian Brandt wrote: > > Recently I updated my Amiga3000/18MB-RAM Debian-2.0 to 3.0. Usually I build > > my own kernel on small systems but a first try took 11 hours and the result > > didn't work. > > > > My installed applications are kernel-package+debs and gcc-2.95 - browsing > > the lists I found the suggestion to use gcc272 for compiling m68k-kernels - > > is this still recommended? > > You need gcc272 for 2.2 (and 2.0 if you really want to try that) kernels. I > built 2.4 with gcc-2.95, but I heard for some people 3.2 or maybe even 3.3 > is working too.
Every mac68k kernel I've built for two years or so has been built with gcc version 2.95.4. These kernels run fine on the 12 different Macs I have and are used with no complaints by many other Mac users. I'd say there is no need to use gcc272.
