On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 10:07:01AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > Atari does not build either. Even after some fixes: > > > > --- linux-2.4/drivers/char/nvram.c.orig 2002-11-30 07:33:03.000000000 > > -0500 > > +++ linux-2.4/drivers/char/nvram.c 2003-03-07 02:19:03.000000000 -0500 > > @@ -98,6 +98,8 @@ > > #define RTC_PORT(x) (TT_RTC_BAS + 2*(x)) > > #define CHECK_DRIVER_INIT() (MACH_IS_ATARI && > > ATARIHW_PRESENT(TT_CLK)) > > > > +#define NVRAM_BYTES (128-NVRAM_FIRST_BYTE) > > + > > That's guesswork?? I'll check my Atari tree to see what did work for me > last time I tried. I'm rather certain I posted the diff to linux-m68k at > the time.
Entirely guesswork, I just copied what I saw in other arches. But Bjoern Buske sent me a private mail, explaining that it should be 50, or (64-NVRAM_FIRST_BYTE). > There's another change to the RTC code that's required to make it link, I > think. That whas to only change I needed to compile this file. > > /* On Ataris, the checksum is over all bytes except the checksum bytes > > * themselves; these are at the very end */ > > #define ATARI_CKS_RANGE_START 0 > > --- linux-2.4/include/asm-m68k/pci.h.orig 2002-11-30 07:39:03.000000000 > > -0500 > > +++ linux-2.4/include/asm-m68k/pci.h 2003-03-07 02:45:29.000000000 > > -0500 > > @@ -7,6 +7,9 @@ > > * Written by Wout Klaren. > > */ > > > > +#define PCIBIOS_MIN_IO 0x1000 > > +#define PCIBIOS_MIN_MEM 0x10000000 > > + > > struct pci_ops; > > > > /* > > > > It would be nice if somebody with atari knowlegde could check these (in if > > they are correct) and fix the problem. > > There's no PCI on Atari. These constants should be meaningless. If they're > actually used for something else (i.e. access to hardware registers), it > would be important to know if these are physical or kernel virtual > addresses. Well, guessed as well, it just needed some number to compile. I have no means of testing atari kernels... but it failed later, maybe I should switch off hades and co completely, just to get a kernel built. BTW [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>uname -a Linux aahz 2.4.20 #1 Tue Mar 4 03:02:52 EST 2003 m68k unknown [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>uptime 10:02:18 up 1 day, 13:09, 1 user, load average: 1.18, 1.09, 1.02 Looks pretty stable till now, if we could get this built for the other subarches, too, we might still be in business for the next release. Note: this is not the kernel that I suggested for the boot-floppies, this one is optimized for my box. It is missing devfs, will try that next time, and gvpscsi, since that made my box unhappy in 2.2.20, and maybe a few more details. But since nobody but me is testing amiga kernels nowadays, I might just as well declare this stable, build new boot-floppies with it, get rid of the other subarches and things become much easier. Objections? Oh, affs has always been failing for me with 2.4.x kernels, so you still need a 2.2 kernel if you want to copy a vmlinuz file to an amiga partition... Christian
