On Sun, 2003-02-23 at 21:31, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Op zo 23-02-2003, om 18:01 schreef Kars de Jong: > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > I tried installing Woody to a new partition from my existing Linux/m68k > > installation (home brewn), using debootstrap as described in the > > installation guide. > > I quickly ran into a problem though: glibc symbol versions. > > > > I have an old glibc version installed (glibc 2.1.3) and apparently > > debootstrap requires at least version 2.3: > > > > bash-2.03# debootstrap --arch m68k woody /mnt/debinst > > http://ftp.belnet.be/debian > > I: Retrieving http://ftp.belnet.be/debian/dists/woody/Release > > I: Validating > > /mnt/debinst/var/lib/apt/lists/debootstrap.invalid_dists_woody_Release > > I: Retrieving > > http://ftp.belnet.be/debian/dists/woody/main/binary-m68k/Packages.gz > > I: Validating > > /mnt/debinst/var/lib/apt/lists/debootstrap.invalid_dists_woody_main_binary-m68k_Packages.gz > > /usr/lib/debootstrap/pkgdetails: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.3' not > > found (required by /usr/lib/debootstrap/pkgdetails) > > bash-2.03# > > > > Isn't it possible to build debootstrap using an older glibc version? Now > > I'm forced to use a different installation method... > > > > I installed debootstrap_0.1.17.17_m68k.deb by the way. > > That's the unstable version, I presume? > > You'd have to install the unstable glibc if you'd want to do that. > Wouldn't advice that, though.
I suppose I could try an older debootstrap. > An easier solution is to make sure there's a deb-src line in your > /etc/apt/sources.list that points to unstable, and run the following > chain of commands: > > apt-get update; apt-get install build-essential; apt-get build-dep > debootstrap; apt-get -b source debootstrap; dpkg -i debootstrap_0*deb > > This should download the unstable sources for debootstrap, compile them, > and install them. After that, you should no longer have any problems > running debootstrap. Yes, that would work if I was installing from a Debian system, however, I'm not. I could of course build it by hand. A binary that works would obviously be more convenient ;-) Kind regards, Kars.
