[There is no need to CC me on mail to debian-x, which I read.] On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:25:14AM +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 02:28:39PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 06:46:03PM +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > > > I have tested the various releases on m68k, so far it seems > > > the module loading in the X server is still broken on the 68060. > > > The statically linked server works fine, would it be possible to > > > make that the default for the m68k until module loading is fixed? > > > > What do you mean by "default"? > > currently I have to install xserver-xfree86-dbg to get a working > server. For m68k it would be better to build xserver-xfree86 with > all drivers and modules statically linked into the server.
Okay, for m68k I will make x-window-system core depend on xserver-xfree86-dbg instead of xserver-xfree86. I beseech you to help debug and fix the XFree86 module loader on m68k. The static server's massive size -- especially unstripped -- is more strongly felt on m68k boxen than on most other Debian architectures. -- G. Branden Robinson | You should try building some of the Debian GNU/Linux | stuff in main that is [EMAIL PROTECTED] | modern...turning on -Wall is like http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | turning on the pain. -- James Troup
pgpnadimNEeJQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
