Hi, On 3/20/19 8:37 PM, Stefano Rivera wrote: > > Personally, I have a strong preference to have all discussions in > public, where possible. But, this was something we thought would be > difficult to do well in public. There is obviously a delicate political > side to this decision. We wanted to be able to speak our minds to each > other, and make a decision as a team, without having to be to carefully > mind every word to avoid causing offence. I hope you can understand > that.
Thanks for make this clear. Everything is better when there is a clear communication about what is happening. > * There hasn't been a DebConf in Europe (where the majority of regular > attendees live) for a number of years now - by the old norms we are > long overdue for one. If there is a demanding for have a DebConf in Europe in 2021, there are a lot of support to that, and DebConf committee believes this is better, I think it's fair that DebConf committee ask to any countries outside Europe make Bids to DebConf21. I am sure if this is a good to everyone, we will support. To me, the worst cenario is leave countries outside Europe make their Bids and in the end, the decision goes to Europe anyway. So, in my opinion, DebConf committee should talk with Indian team to wait 2022. Best regards, -- Paulo Henrique de Lima Santana (phls) Curitiba - Brasil Debian Developer Diretor do Instituto para Conservação de Tecnologias Livres Membro da Comunidade Curitiba Livre Site: http://www.phls.com.br GNU/Linux user: 228719 GPG ID: 0443C450 Organizador da DebConf19 - Conferência Mundial de Desenvolvedores(as) Debian Curitiba - 21 a 28 de julho de 2019 http://debconf19.debconf.org
