also sprach Tassia Camoes Araujo <tas...@debian.org> [2015-08-31 06:26 +0200]: > I've just created a "Discussion" session in our wiki to collect > the main points brought to the table from each one of you so that > we can easily keep track of where the discussion is going. > > https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/Teams#Discussion
While I am sure it's appreciated that you put all this time into these summaries, I don't think this approach is appropriate. First of all, you claim this to be a proposal, and that anyone can submit counter-proposals. How? Should we make direct changes to the wiki page? As I have suggested to you in private mail, I think it'd be best if you reverted all changes and instead created e.g. https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/Teams/2015_ChairsProposal with your text and changes. This would allow counter-proposals in the same namespace, without giving any more weight to the one made by the chairs. Second, taking stuff out of context is a sure-fire way to misrepresent or miss the whole picture. At the very least, I think you should include links to the original messages from where you pulled a quote. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madd...@debconf.org> @martinkrafft : :' : DebConf orga team `. `'` `- DebConf16: Cape Town: https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16 DebConf17 in your country? https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf17
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
