also sprach Maximiliano Curia <m...@debian.org> [2015-08-29 20:06 +0200]: > This is the first of a series of threads about making the content > team more public, documenting things that were done and things > that can be improved.
\o/ > From the conference software part it would be better if it had an official > mobile page, a clear distinction of the official schedule and the adhoc > sessions, and a usable scheduling admin interface. Why do we want a distinction between ad-hoc stuff and the official schedule? > More feedback wanted! > + What do you think? What needs to be improved? I had the impression that it really worked a lot better than last year. The idea of using a whiteboard or chalkboard seems to make a lot of sense. Personally, I never used the online schedule much, as I'd learn of ad-hoc events from the mailing list and then just added them to my own calendar. > + Should we keep the unconference style adhoc scheduling? I'd say: yes, definitely. I think it's a core part of our conference. If we didn't coordinate this, people would find ways anyway. I've even heard and entertained thoughts about extending it and *reducing* the number of "officially scheduled events" to two tracks (e.g. technical and political/social/philosophical), concentrating on events we know will draw a large audience, and making sure that there is enough space for everyone else, including the possibility to video-stream, etc. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madd...@debconf.org> @martinkrafft : :' : DebConf orga team `. `'` `- DebConf16: Cape Town: https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16 DebConf17 in your country? https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf17
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
