On Thursday 27 August 2015 22:31:38 Margarita Manterola wrote: >HI, > >On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Tassia Camoes Araujo <tas...@debian.org> >wrote: >> About localteam: we were open to nominate the localteam in the teams >> structure, >> since it was a strong request from dc15 people, though dc16 team prefers to >> work without the local/global split. There are some tasks and >> responsibilities >> that will clearly be performed by the local organizers, but they prefer to do >> it within the previously defined teams. Of course this can be re-discussed >> for >> future years. > >DC16 team, can you please elaborate on this? I've been a fierce >supporter of the existence of the local team, as it gives people that >are local and are new to DebConf a space to which they can feel like >they belong and in my experience it makes for a much better DebConf if >there's an involved local team. I'd like to hear your reasons for not >wanting a local team.
Personally.... It doesn't bother me one or the other way. I feel like I belong and am part of the team already no matter their geographical location. I have a long list of people that have worked with (or been involved in) the budget in the past (and spoke to many of them during DC15), everyone is very friendly and welcoming. I also have defined escalation points for issues and questions and very many people that are more than willing to help me with queries I have. I've also paid attention to previous issues on the ML and the recent discussions. Then again, I have been working in large geographically diverse teams most of my life :) -N DO NOT send email to this address: nkukarde89...@lbsd.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
